Legal Opinion

Flansberg v. Paulson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1965PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

The plaintiff, Ellen Flansberg, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the automobile in which she was riding was struck from the rear by an automobile operated by the defendants. The court granted a mistrial because of what it deemed misconduct of the jury in arriving at its verdict, and defendants appeal. Defendants contend that the court should have entered judgment for plaintiff on the second of two verdicts returned by the jury.

In her amended complaint the plaintiff alleged that her injuries consisted “of shock to the nervous system, strain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mullins v. ROWE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saum v. BonarOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moore v. DrennanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kennedy v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Wheeler v. HustonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Brannan v. SlempOregon Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API