Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 3, 1961No. Reap. Dec. 10055; Entry No. 988947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

The merchandise involved herein consists of so-called Lodge spark plugs, imported from England, and entered for consumption on May 12, 1959. The various items were invoiced, entered, and appraised as follows:

The merchandise was entered as automobile parts, classifiable under paragraph 369 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, at 10% per centum ad valorem. The examiner advisorily approved this classification.

The final list of merchandise to be appraised under section 402a of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, includes “Automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Chr. Bjelland & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. H. W. Robinson Air Freight Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. American Hydrolan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API