Legal Opinion

H. W. Robinson Air Freight Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 4, 1960No. C.D. 2207PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The facts in the case at bar are set forth in a stipulation filed by counsel for the parties reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, that the merchandise, a floor covering in the form of tiles. 10% inches by 10% inches, %e of an inch in thickness, some grey-green and others tan in color, covered by the above enumerated protest was assessed with duty at the rate of 17% ad valorem plus 21 cents per pound under paragraph 1589(b), Tariff Act of June 17, 1930,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Wm. A. Hausman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API