Legal Opinion

American Hydrolan Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 7, 1970No. R.D. 11700; Entry Nos. 560315; 545703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WatsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve certain cosmetic raw material known as Lanocerina, exported from Italy in *673April and May of 1964. American Hydrolan Corp. is the present name of the concern formerly known as American Lanolin Corp. It was stipulated between the parties that the correct basis for valuation is export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165. It was further stipulated that the merchandise does not appear on the “Final List” published in T.D. 54521 covering…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API