Legal Opinion
Ascherman v. General Reinsurance Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1986No. A030328PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANNELL, J.
The trial court dismissed with prejudice appellant Stanford W. Ascherman’s complaint against respondents General Reinsurance Corporation 1 and North Star Reinsurance Corporation. Ascherman appeals, contending that the trial court erred when it held that his complaint did not state a cause of action for either declaratory relief or unjust enrichment. We disagree and affirm the order of dismissal.
I. Facts
In 1965, appellant Dr. Stanford W. Ascherman treated a patient in an allegedly negligent manner. Ascherman’s patient did not discover the alleged negligence until 1977, at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & KnuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- American Re-Insurance Co. v. INSURANCE COM'N, ETC.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Lipton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Harper v. Wausau InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.