Legal Opinion
Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1994No. A060386PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
— Frank N. Jones, Donna M. Jones and Snowcreek, Inc. (Jones), appeal from the judgment entered in favor of respondent Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), following the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend to Jones’s first amended complaint for tortious breach of insurance contract.
Factual and Procedural Background
Our review of the sufficiency of a complaint against a general demurrer admits all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law. (See Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 [216 Cal.Rptr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Canfora v. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Panavision International, L.P. v. ToeppenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Harper v. Wausau InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.