Legal Opinion

Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1992No. S014036PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

Insurance Code section 620 (all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated) defines a reinsurance contract as “one by which an insurer procures a third person to insure him against loss or liability by reason of such original insurance.” Typically, under a reinsurance contract, the primary insurer “cedes” a portion of the premiums for its policies, and the losses on those policies, to the reinsurer.

In a reinsurance transaction, policyholders pay premiums to their original insurer, who, in turn, pays a reinsurer a percentage of the initial premiums…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Bed, Bath & Beyond of La Jolla, Inc. v. La Jolla Village Square Venture PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API