Legal Opinion

In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH XXXX-XXXXXX

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 5, 2003No. 1 CA-MH 02-0009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 When a psychiatric resident conducts the mandatory examination of an individual who is the subject of a petition for court-ordered, involuntary evaluation or treatment, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 36-501(ll)(a) (2003) requires that the resident be supervised in the examination. We hold that although the supervising physician need not be physically present during the examination, the State must be able to present admissible evidence demonstrating that the resident was actually supervised by an attending physician with respect to the examination of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State for Best Interest of L.C.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arizona State Hospital v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. In re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH 2003-000058Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. In re MH 2007-001275Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API