Legal Opinion
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 8, 2008No. 1 CA-MH 07-0023PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
196 P.3d 819 (2008)
In re MH XXXX-XXXXXX.
No. 1 CA-MH 07-0023.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.
April 8, 2008.
Review Denied October 28, 2008.
James J. Haas, Maricopa County Public Defender, by Edith M. Lucero, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.
Andrew P. Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney, by Bruce P. White, Deputy County Attorney and Anne C. Longo, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
KESSLER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant, G.M., appeals the decision of the superior court finding him persistently or acutely disabled and ordering…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010