Legal Opinion
Kobre v. Photoral Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Both plaintiffs and defendants have entered motions in this action. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the ground of this court’s lack of jurisdiction over the parties and over the subject matter of the suit. Plaintiffs move for an order enjoining certain alleged practices of the defendants during the pendency of the action.
Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment as to the validity and infringement of defendants’ patent #2,505,787. Defendants’ motion will be considered first.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 2201 empowers this Court, “In a case of actual controversy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Thermo-Plastics Corp. v. International Pulverizing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Wolverine Fabricating & Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Gasket & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- EJ Brooks Co. v. Stoffel Seals CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Velveray CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Telephonics Corp. v. Lindly & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Formmaster Corp. v. G. H. Bishop Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956