Legal Opinion
Thermo-Plastics Corp. v. International Pulverizing Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 28, 1941No. Civil Action C-1482PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AVIS, District Judge.
On April 9, 1941, plaintiff filed its complaint against the defendant. Generally stated, it is alleged therein that defendant was the owner of two certain United States patents; that plaintiff manufactured certain mills for the grinding and pulverizing of materials and has used and leased same; that said mills of plaintiff do not infringe any valid claims of defendant’s patents; that all of the claims of the defendant’s “Andrews” patent are void by reason of prior patents covering the same construction, and the same or similar charge applying to the so-called “Hobbie”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Alfred Hofmann, Inc. v. Knitting MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Dr. Beck & Co. G.M.B.H. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- American Needle & Novelty Co. v. Schuessler Knitting Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- United States v. Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Kobre v. Photoral Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.