Legal Opinion

Telephonics Corp. v. Lindly & Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 16, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 20136PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a defendant’s motion to dismiss a complaint in whole or in part, in an action in which plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment respecting infringement and validity of two patents owned by defendant; and that plaintiffs have not used any secret or proprietary information pertaining to defendant in the manufacture or sale of machinery and apparatus designed for use by the textile industry and which is in competition with defendant’s patented devices.

The complaint was filed October 1, 1959, and an amended complaint on October 6, 1959. By a consent order of January 8,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Telechron, Inc. v. ParissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William Gluckin & Co., Inc. v. International Playtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Telephonics Corporation and Fabrionics Corporation v. Lindly & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Delamere Company v. Taylor-Bell Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. American Household Products, Inc. v. Evans Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Mann Design Ltd. v. Bounce, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API