Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Company v. Velveray Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action is one for a declaratory judgment stating that plaintiffs have not infringed on defendant’s trademark and that the trade-mark is invalid and void.
The facts are essentially as follows:
On February 7, 1956 and February 14, 1956, plaintiffs began to use the trademark “Verel”, first on synthetic yarns and then on synthetic staple fibre. On March 1, 1956, plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company filed applications to register the mark “Verel” under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Zenie Bros. v. MiskendDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Windsurfing International Inc. v. Amf IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Brown v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Universal Sewing MacHine Co. v. Standard Sewing Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.