Czajka v. Sadowski
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff in Detroit suffered fracture of a bone in the leg, and defendant, a physician and surgeon, was called to reduce it. In the treatment given defendant is charged with malpractice. Plaintiff and other lay witnesses in his behalf testified of the facts respecting treatment, and, to prove that it was in some respects improper, plaintiff called a medical witness, Dr. Malejan, who testified of opinion relative to some features of the treatment.
Dr. Malejan according’to the record is a specialist of high degree of skill and efficiency, of greater skill and learning than that ordinarily…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Spaulding v. BlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Rytkonen v. LojaconoMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Perri v. TassieMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976