Legal Opinion

Siirila v. Barrios

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 56786, (Calendar No. 11)Published

1Opinion of the Court

398 Mich. 576 (1976)

248 N.W.2d 171

SIIRILA

v.

BARRIOS

Docket No. 56786, (Calendar No. 11).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued June 8, 1976.

Decided December 21, 1976.

Lopatin, Miller, Bindes & Freedman (Michael H. Feiler, of counsel) for plaintiffs.

Platt, Peacock & von Wiegen for defendant Barrios.

McClean & McCarthy for defendant St. Joseph's Hospital.

WILLIAMS, J.

This malpractice case raises three questions. The first question is whether a properly qualified medical specialist witness may testify as to the standard of care that a general practitioner should meet. The second question is what the proper…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API