Legal Opinion
Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 2000No. AC 18371PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Jacques All Trades Corporation (Jacques), appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding the named defendant, Láveme Brown, attorney’s fees on her counterclaim that alleged a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., where the court concluded that Jacques had violated CUTPA but found that Brown did not suffer any actual damages. Brown, in turn, cross appeals, claiming that the court improperly (1) calculated attorney’s fees on her CUTPA counterclaim by not awarding fees for those claims that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Elm City Cheese Co. v. FedericoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Rokus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Heller v. D. W. Fish Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- TRAYSTMAN, CORIC AND KERAMIDAS v. DaigleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Taylor v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.