Legal Opinion
Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 3, 2000No. CIV.A. 3:98-CV-1657(JCH)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS [DKT. NO. 442]
HALL, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
This action was commenced in August 1998 by Bristol Technology, Inc. (“Bristol”), a Connecticut corporation primarily owned by the Blackwell family. In its fourteen-count Complaint, Bristol alleged various theories of violations by Microsoft Corp. (“Microsoft”) of the federal and state antitrust laws and of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”). At the time it filed its complaint, Bristol sought a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery. The court held a hearing on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Woods Masonry, Inc. v. Monumental General Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- Charts v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Fabri v. UNITED TECHS. INT'L., INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Fabri v. United Technologies International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.