Legal Opinion
Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 22, 2012No. AC 32797PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendants, United Parcel Service, Inc., and Kevin Trudelle, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Tomiek. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) denied their motions to direct and to set aside the verdict with respect to the plaintiffs claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and violations of General Statutes § 31-5 lx 2 and General Statutes § 46a-60, 3 (2) denied Tru-delle’s motion to remit or set aside the verdict against him for negligent infliction of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Stubbs v. ICare Management, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Cima v. SciarettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Johnson v. PikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.