Legal Opinion

Adams Outdoor Advertising of Charlotte v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1993No. 9210SC937PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

In this appeal, we must determine whether defendant’s planting of trees and vegetation within its right-of-way adjacent to premises on which plaintiff owns and leases outdoor advertising signs (billboards) constitutes a taking of plaintiff’s property such that plaintiff is entitled to compensation. At issue are eleven billboards which are located on private property adjacent to the Airport Connector Road and the Billy Graham Parkway in Mecklen-burg County. Plaintiff’s contention is that the trial court erred in dismissing its complaint because, according to plaintiff, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Powe v. OdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Schloss Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API