Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLARD, J.
Action upon a fire insurance policy. A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled, defendant answered; and thereupon, on motion of plaintiff, judgment was rendered for him on the pleadings. Defendant, the insurance company, appealed from the judgment. The defendant W. R. Porter made default, and do’es not appeal.
It appears from the pleadings that the policy in question was issued to said Porter upon certain buildings on his land, including a dwelling-house which was insured for seven hundred and fifty dollars, and also upon certain personal property. Porter procured the policy and paid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Duff v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Breedlove v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pauline Rosenbaum v. John Funcannon, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha A. Call, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. MildenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.