Cady v. Purser
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Suit to quiet title. Each party to the action claims title to the land in controversy under the Eagle Lake Land and Irrigation Company, a corporation—the plaintiff by virtue of a sheriff’s deed under two judgments rendered against the corporation, and the defendant by virtue of a sheriff’s sale under a judgment foreclosing a mortgage executed by the corporation. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the corporation upon a money demand, June 13, 1893, and at the sheriff’s sale under an execution issued thereon,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gillig v. . MaassNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Neslin v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.