State v. Morrow
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant, who was convicted following a bench trial of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, appeals, asserting that he did not voluntarily and knowingly waive his right to a jury trial. Defendant acknowledges that he did not raise and adequately preserve that issue in the trial court. However, he contends that, because he represented himself, he could not “be expected to object to the trial court’s failure to adequately inform him of his right to a jury trial, when he was not properly advised of those rights in the first place.” As described below, we reject that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thorson v. Bend Mem'l ClinicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Read v. OREGON MEDICAL BOARDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Hanson Joint Revocable Living Trust v. SligerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.