Legal Opinion

Moen v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. 87C-11030; CA A61667PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He assigns error to the post-conviction court’s finding that his conviction was not rendered void because of inadequate assistance of trial counsel. We reverse.

Petitioner pleaded no contest to a charge of sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. The trial court imposed a sentence of 20 years imprisonment, with a ten-year minimum sentence. Petitioner sought post-conviction relief, alleging a substantial denial of his state and federal constitutional rights on the basis of failure of counsel to advise him before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Meyers v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API