Moen v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He assigns error to the post-conviction court’s finding that his conviction was not rendered void because of inadequate assistance of trial counsel. We reverse.
Petitioner pleaded no contest to a charge of sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. The trial court imposed a sentence of 20 years imprisonment, with a ten-year minimum sentence. Petitioner sought post-conviction relief, alleging a substantial denial of his state and federal constitutional rights on the basis of failure of counsel to advise him before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Meyers v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.