Vestal v. Young
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. F. A. Kelley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal'by defendants from a judgment enjoining them from using or maintaining a certain ditch constructed by them upon and across certain land of plaintiff in Lassen County, from carrying or conducting1 water across said land by means of said ditch, and from entering upon said land for the purpose of repairing said ditch, and also awarding plaintiff five dollars damages and his costs.
The facts of the case, as shown by the findings of the court, are very simple. Plaintiff acquired his land by patent from the. United States on April 18, 1883, and has ever since owned and possessed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. Clear Lake Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Barrows v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Burris v. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Mott v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.