Legal Opinion

Welcome v. Hess

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1891No. 14245PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

— Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

*510This action is by a landlord to recover damages from his tenants. He avers that in October, 1887, he owned the demised premises, and was carrying on there a lucrative bakery business, whic.i business added largely to the value of the premises; that defendants proposed to hire the premises, bakery, and business for five years, and to purchase his horses and wagons and the equipments of the establishment, and falsely and fraudulently represented that they would enlarge the establishment and business, and would operate the same for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Respini v. PortaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ladd & Bush v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Marseilles v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Casper Nationak Bank v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Von Schleinitz v. North Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API