In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice. [Doc. 94.] Plaintiffs filed an opposition, [Doc. No. 107], and Defendants filed a reply, [Doc. No. 114]. The Court held a hearing on the motion on Thursday, September 27, 2012.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Enslin v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.