Legal Opinion

In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 11, 2012No. MDL No. 11md2258 AJB (MDD); Civil Case Nos. 11cv2119, 11cv2120PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice. [Doc. 94.] Plaintiffs filed an opposition, [Doc. No. 107], and Defendants filed a reply, [Doc. No. 114]. The Court held a hearing on the motion on Thursday, September 27, 2012.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. In re Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  3. Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Enslin v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API