Legal Opinion
In re Apollo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1983. He had been admitted in New Jersey in 1967, where he has maintained his law practice.
By consent order dated March 26, 1996, respondent was temporarily suspended from practice by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, pending full determination of all grievances and until further order of that court. After respondent was temporarily suspended, the New Jersey disciplinary authori*732ties brought a complaint of misconduct against him alleging substantial conversion of trust account funds. The allegations were based on a February 1996 audit of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- In re SteinbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re PisacaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re MoedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re NussbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re WeekesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re ApolloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re MarkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re DeleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005