Legal Opinion
In re Pisacane
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He was admitted to the New Jersey Bar in 1969. He has maintained an office and residence in New Jersey.
By order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 12, *9821995, respondent was "immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law”. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, advises that after respondent failed to make an appearance on September 12, 1995, the New Jersey Supreme Court continued the temporary suspension in an order from the Bench.
Petitioner moves to reciprocally discipline…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re SchechtermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re ApolloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re OlitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re PisacaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997