Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, moves for an order suspending respondent attorney from the practice of law or, in the alternative, imposing appropriate discipline, since respondent is either mentally disabled and unable to defend himself against pending charges of professional misconduct or is unwilling to do so. A consent to indefinite suspension, executed by respondent, has been submitted on his behalf.

The question is whether respondent should be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law pursuant to consent because of the claimed mental disability while…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Leviten v. SandbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. In re DubinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. In re NicoliniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re ApolloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Matter of KeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Mildner v. GulottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API