Legal Opinion
In re Steinbach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the New York Bar at this Department in 1952, three years after his admission to practice *89in Florida. A resident of Florida, he has never complied with New York’s biennial registration requirements for attorneys.
In February 1996, respondent was permitted to resign from the Florida Bar in lieu of all sanctions except costs, in the face of two disciplinary proceedings charging his failure to render an accounting to a client upon request, commingling and misappropriation of trust funds, failure to maintain minimum trust accounting records or to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re JaffeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In re MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re ApolloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matter of KulcsarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.