Legal Opinion

In re Markel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1958. In recent years, he maintained an office for the practice of law only in Nevada, where he is also an admitted attorney.

By order filed June 5, 2001, the Supreme Court of Nevada transferred respondent to disability inactive status, based upon a joint petition and stipulation by the State Bar of Nevada and respondent. According to the order, the parties stipulated that respondent “is presently incapacitated * * * from continuing to practice law.” To be reinstated to practice in Nevada, respondent must show by clear and convincing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re ApolloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re DeleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API