People v. Zarazua
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
We publish this order to put to rest a challenge to a procedure commonly used by defendants to perfect appeals from judgments in criminal cases.
After his trial attorney failed to file a timely notice of appeal, despite a request to do so, defendant Sergio Zarazua asked this court to deem his notice of appeal to be timely under the “constructive filing doctrine.” (In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 85 [109 Cal.Rptr. 785, 514 P.2d 97] (hereafter Benoit).) The People now move for us to vacate and reconsider our order granting defendant’s motion. They contend that a request for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band Indians, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- (HC) Parker v. Napa Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Garg v. GargCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- In re A.R.California Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.