Legal Opinion

(HC) Parker v. Napa Superior Court

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 6, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00367Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEWAYNE PARKER, Case No. 25-cv-03041-TLT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 9 v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION; 10 NAPA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 8 12 13 Dewayne Parker brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. Section 14

2254. He also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 8, which is granted. 15 Petitioner’s motion for ex parte habeas relief, Dkt. No. 7, is denied. 16 LEGAL STANDARD…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Muth v. FondrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Hall v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. ScaffidiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API