Legal Opinion

Garg v. Garg

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 2022No. G061500Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/7/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE VEENA GARG, Plaintiff and Respondent, G061500 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020-01128565) RAJIV GARG et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Deborah C. Servino, Judge. Motion to dismiss granted; appeal dismissed. Ronald D. Steinbach for Plaintiff and Respondent Veena Garg. David Zarmi and Stuart L. Wallach for Defendants and Appellants Rajiv Garg and Sadhana Garg. * * * THE COURT:* “‘[T]he timely filing of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API