Legal Opinion

Koeberle v. Friganza

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1924No. Civ. No. 4203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The respondent, as assignee of J. W. Robinson Company, drygoods merchants, instituted this action against the above-named defendants for a balance claimed to he due for merchandise sold and delivered upon an open book account in September and October, 1919, and an account stated was also made the subject of a second count of the complaint, aggregating $2,148.37. The total amount for alleged purchases was $4,083.62, upon which $1,806 had been paid in cash, and defendants were credited with $129.25 for goods returned. Since the trial Thomas O’Day died, and the administratrix of his estate was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bentley v. HurlburtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kamm v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Laiblin v. San Joaquin Agricultural Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Braun v. DallinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Hicks v. FrazerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API