Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
— This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff on a passenger train of defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff of fifteen thousand three hundred dollars. Defendant moved for a new trial upon various statutory grounds, including excessive damages. The trial court made an order that if the plaintiff should consent that the judgment be reduced to nine thousand dollars, the new trial would be denied, and that otherwise it would be granted. Plaintiff filed a written consent to such reduction and the motion was thereupon denied.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kinsey v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Gardner v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Durfee v. GarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carpentier v. GardinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Benedict v. CozzensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Garoutte v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.