Legal Opinion

Kamm v. Bank of California

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1887No. 9412PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

This is an action to recover from the defendant, the Bank of California (a corporation), the sum of $20,810, interest, and costs of suit.

The cause was tried by the court (a jury having been waived), written findings filed, and judgment entered thereon in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $32,051.60, and costs.

Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The action was commenced on the twenty-third day of September, 1876, and was tried upon the issues made by the fourth amended complaint, filed April 27, 1883, and the answer thereto, up to and pending the trial,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parsons v. CopelandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  2. McDermott v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Dolinar v. PedoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClauseWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API