Legal Opinion

Laiblin v. San Joaquin Agricultural Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1923No. Civ. No. 2517PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $18,991.69, claimed to be due him for work or services performed by him for the defendant in building levees and reservoirs upon and leveling and checking certain lands owned by the latter and situated in the county of Madera. The services for which the plaintiff here seeks compensation were performed in pursuance of the terms of a written contract entered into by and between the parties to this action on the seventeenth day of January, 1920. The aid of a jury was invoked and a verdict returned in favor of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Wilcox v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lessing v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Storm & Butts v. LipscombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API