Legal Opinion

Maddex v. Columber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1926No. 19166PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Before considering alleged grounds of error, it must first be determined whether the state of this record was such that the bill of exceptions disclosed the errors upon which the Court of Appeals based its judgment of reversal.

Plaintiffs in error contend that a reviewing court in a case where none of the evidence is made a part of the bill of exceptions, and no findings of fact are made, may not find prejudicial error in the charge of the court, and therefore enter a judgment of reversal,

It is to be remembered that the errors complained of appear in the impaneling of the jury, in charge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Goshen v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Broadway Manufacturing Co. v. Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Cason v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. McGinty v. City of KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API