Legal Opinion
State v. Madrigal
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 2000No. 1997-0098PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 378.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MADRIGAL, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Madrigal,
2000-Ohio-448.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when—Evidence— Hearsay statements deemed sufficiently reliable to allow their admission into evidence without benefit of cross-examination, when—Accomplice’s confession that inculpates a criminal defendant is not within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule—Out-of-court statements made by an accomplice that incriminate the defendant may be admitted as…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- State v. Adams, Unpublished Decision (1-28-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. EicholtzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. VickersOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MockOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Huston, Ca2006-05-021 (8-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.