Berk v. Matthews
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
I
It is the initial contention of appellant that the court of appeals erred in reversing the judgment below because a potential juror should have been removed for cause.4 This court has previously observed that the decision to disqualify a juror for bias is a discretionary function of the trial court. See Maddex v. Columber (1926), *169114 Ohio St. 178, 183, 151 N.E. 56, 57. See, also, State v. Bedford (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 122, 128, 529 N.E. 2d 913, 920. Where a trial court is vested with such authority, reversal on appeal is justified only if its exercise thereof constitutes an abuse of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BedfordOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by403 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
398 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.