Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
1 In this action for breach of an exelusivity clause in a professional services contract, plaintiff, Neuromonitoring Associates, appeals the district court's summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Centura Health Corporation, Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado, and Portereare Adventist *488Health System. The district court concluded that plaintiff's claims were subject to a three-year statute of limitations, that equitable tolling of the limitations period was unwarranted based on the evidence presented, and that the entire action must be dismissed because…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Hi-Lite Products Company v. American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Empire Indus. Inc. v. Winslyn Indus., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Maiteki v. Marten Transportation Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Damian v. Mountain Parks Electric, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Belfor v. RileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Box Elder Kids, LLC v. Anadarko E & P Onshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.