Legal Opinion

Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2012No. 11CA1391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge LOEB.

1 In this action for breach of an exelusivity clause in a professional services contract, plaintiff, Neuromonitoring Associates, appeals the district court's summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Centura Health Corporation, Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado, and Portereare Adventist *488Health System. The district court concluded that plaintiff's claims were subject to a three-year statute of limitations, that equitable tolling of the limitations period was unwarranted based on the evidence presented, and that the entire action must be dismissed because…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Hi-Lite Products Company v. American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Empire Indus. Inc. v. Winslyn Indus., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Maiteki v. Marten Transportation Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  3. Damian v. Mountain Parks Electric, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Belfor v. RileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Box Elder Kids, LLC v. Anadarko E & P Onshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API