Legal Opinion

Empire Indus. Inc. v. Winslyn Indus., LLC

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided June 21, 2018No. Case No. 18 C 698PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

Empire Industries Inc. (Empire) contends that Winslyn Industries, LLC (Winslyn) tortiously interfered in a contract between Empire and The Fireclay Factory LLC and Niko (INT) Ltd. (collectively, Fireclay) to produce sinks. Empire urges the Court to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent Winslyn from benefitting from its interference.

Background

This is a case about fireclay sinks, which are formed from clay fired at very high temperatures. They have existed for many years but are newly popular among homeowners. This suit arises from Empire's allegation…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Diamantopolous v. 1517660 Ontario IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Empire Industries Inc. v. Winslyn Industries, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Empire Industries Inc. v. Winslyn Industries, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Empire Industries Inc. v. Winslyn Industries, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Empire Industries Inc. v. Winslyn Industries, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API