Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'n

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 10, 1992No. 91SC276PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

I

This case presents an issue concerning the timeliness of a claimant’s filing of a petition to reopen a workers’ compensation proceeding in order to seek additional disability benefit payments based on a worsened physical condition. An administrative law judge (“AU”) held claimant Gary M. Garrett’s petition to reopen time-barred by section 8-43-303(2)(a), 3B C.R.S. (1991 Supp.). An Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (“Panel”) affirmed, specifically rejecting the claimant’s arguments that the employer and insurer should be estopped to assert the bar of the statute of limitations because of their…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Garrett v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Morrison v. GoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Chasteen v. Unisia Jecs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API