Legal Opinion

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Hartman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 1996No. 95SC57PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari in Hartman v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 897 P.2d 842 (Colo. App. 1994), to determine whether the court of appeals erred in finding that the equitable tolling doctrine applies to defeat the statute of limitations where a litigant waited to bring action against the defendants until he had a positive result in a related action against a third party.1 We find that since neither the actions of the defendants nor the lawsuit against the third party in any way impeded the litigant’s right to file suit against the defendant, the doctrine of equitable tolling does not prevent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Seattle Audubon SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Rantz v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Braxton v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Morrison v. GoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Chasteen v. Unisia Jecs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API