Legal Opinion
Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 8, 1993No. 3:86-1796-21PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TRAXLER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In their second amended complaint, Plaintiffs, a conglomeration of corporations and their insurers, (collectively, “Myrtle Beach”), assert claims of common law negligence and breach of implied warranty of merchantability pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in South Carolina, see S.C.Code Ann. §§ 36-1-101 to 36-10-103 (Law.Co-op.1976 & Supp. 1992), against Defendant Emerson Electric…
2Cases cited108 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Gunkel v. Renovations, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Naporano Iron & Metal Co. v. American Crane Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- DAKOTA GASIFICATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. PASCOE BUILDING SYSTEMS, a DIVISION OF AMCORD, INC.; Del Con, Inc., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Grams v. Milk Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.