Legal Opinion
CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. Goldfeld
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1990No. 87 Civ. 6113 (MBM)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruick-shank (“Alexanders”), a London investment banker, arranged for certain of its clients to purchase in Great Britain 2 million shares in Container Industries, Inc. (“Container” or “CU”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. The purchase was part of a private placement in June 1986. Plaintiff hired defendant Arthur Andersen & Co. of England (“Andersen-U.K.”) to provide a “comfort letter” 1 for inclusion in the prospectus. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Arthur Andersen & Co., an…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WaterhouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- PI, Inc. v. Quality Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Beckman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Griffin v. McNiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.