Legal Opinion

People v. Wagner

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1916No. Crim. No. 607PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The defendant in this case, upon an information charging him with the crime of murder, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to serve a term of eight years in the state prison at San Quentin. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying the defendant a new trial.

The facts of the case upon which the people relied for a conviction, briefly stated, are these: At and prior to the time of the alleged commission of the offense the defendant, Roy Wagner, a boy of nineteen years of age, was residing with his father, the deceased, Otto F. Wagner, at the home of the latter near the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. VertreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People v. RaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. TugwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API