Legal Opinion

People v. Tugwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1917No. Crim. No. 496PublishedCited by 44 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the eourt.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Upon a charge of committing the crime of murder, in that he did willfully, unlawfully, and with malice aforethought kill one Maude Kennedy, defendant was convicted of manslaughter. He prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and an order of court denying his motion for a new trial.

There was a former trial of the case which resulted in defendant being convicted of murder in the first degree, following which sentence of imprisonment for life was pronounced upon him. On appeal that judgment was reversed. As presented by the record herein; the facts concerning the homicide and the circumstances…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. SimonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API