Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1991No. C008346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for declaratory relief, the impetus for which was an automobile accident. Plaintiff, William Holcomb, sought a declaration of his rights under the uninsured motor vehicle provisions of an insurance policy issued him by defendant, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford), The trial court concluded Hartford was obligated to pay full coverage without reduction for amounts paid to plaintiff on behalf of an underinsured motorist or for amounts paid to plaintiff under the medical expense portion of the policy. On appeal,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Security National Insurance v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Travelers Insurance v. BouzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Century Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Mercury Insurance v. Vanwanseele-WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Allstate Insurance v. VavasourDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
  4. Arrasmith v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Escobedo v. Estate of SniderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API